President Donald Trump's executive orders against diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs have sparked strong opposition among women who work in STEM fields in the federal government. According to NBCNews, although the government justified the decision as an effort to promote merit-based hiring, many professionals see the measure as an attempt to deepen gender and ethnic inequalities in these sectors. Scientists and engineers have expressed concern about the impact of the new policy on their careers, fearing lost opportunities and a less inclusive work environment.

The Trump administration's decision comes against a backdrop of persistent inequality in STEM, where women and racial minorities remain underrepresented and underpaid by their male counterparts. Data from the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics reveals that while women make up more than half of the U.S. population, they held only one-third of STEM jobs in 2021. In addition, black and Hispanic workers were proportionally less present in these careers, while studies show that professional progression for marginalized groups is slower, especially within federal institutions.

Professionals affected by the new guideline reported that inclusion programs were fundamental for their insertion and permanence in STEM. One federal biologist, for example, pointed out to NBC News that her trajectory began with a paid internship for underrepresented groups, allowing her to compete for positions in the industry. The elimination of these initiatives, according to her, does not mean more fairness in the selection of candidates, but rather the closing of doors to those who have historically had less access to opportunities.

Diversity in science and technology, the employees argue, not only broadens access to careers, but also strengthens scientific output by incorporating different perspectives and experiences.

In addition to structural barriers, the lack of support spaces within the government can aggravate the feeling of isolation among women and minorities. Employee resource groups, which are now under threat, have always been essential for employees to share experiences, navigate workplace dynamics, and have a sense of belonging. Without these networks, many fear that the organizational culture will become even more exclusionary, according to the article.

While the Trump administration argues that the elimination of DEI programs represents a return to meritocracy, STEM professionals in the public sector warn of the negative effects of this decision. For them, diversity does not mean unfair favoritism, but the creation of conditions for everyone to have real chances to compete and contribute to the advancement of science and technology in the country.